Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the comparative statics of the incumbency advantage in a model of electoral selection and strategic challenger entry. The incumbency advantage arises in the model because, on average, incumbents have greater ability than challengers. This is true for two reasons: high-ability candidates are more likely to win election (electoral selection) and high-quality incumbents deter challengers (strategic challenger entry). We show that this quality-based incumbency advantage is expected to be greater for high visibility offices, in polities with relatively small partisan tides, in unpolarized electoral environments, and in electorates that are relatively balanced in their partisan preferences.
منابع مشابه
Challenger Quality and the Incumbency Advantage
Most estimates of the incumbency advantage and the electoral benefits of previous officeholding experience do not account for strategic entry by high-quality challengers. We address this issue by using term limits as an instrument for challenger quality. Studying U.S. state legislatures, we find strong evidence of strategic behavior by experienced challengers (consistent with previous studies)....
متن کاملChallenger Entry and Voter Learning
We develop a model of strategic interaction between voters and potential electoral challengers to sitting incumbents, in which the very fact of a costly challenge conveys relevant information to voters. Given incumbent failure in office, challenger entry is more likely, but the threat of entry by inferior challengers creates an incentive for citizens to become more politically informed. At the ...
متن کاملDo the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents?
We develop a model that calls into question whether some key sources of incumbency advantage frequently cited in the empirical and theoretical literature are, in fact, beneficial to all types of incumbents. Our results show that increases in direct officeholder benefits, such as the “campaign discount” that incumbents enjoy relative to challengers and the pro-incumbent bias of interest groups m...
متن کاملThe Effects of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. Senate on the Choice of Electoral Design: Evidence from a Dynamic Selection Model∗
Since 1914, incumbent U.S. senators running for reelection have won almost 80% of the time. We investigate why incumbents win so often, and how changes in electoral design would affect the value of senatorial seat. We allow for three potential explanations for the incumbency advantage: selection, tenure, and challenger quality, which are separately identified using histories of election outcome...
متن کاملUsing Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When O±ceholders Retire Strategically1
In an earlier contribution to this journal, Gelman and King (1990) propose methods of measuring the incumbency advantage that have become widely used in the literature. Recently, however, critics have argued that these measures, as well as less sophisticated measures of incumbency advantage that preceded them, su®er from a failure to consider strategic retirements that may lead to as much as a ...
متن کامل